CVE-2018-0238

CRITICALNVD 9.99.9
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.9 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2022-05-13. NVD baseline CVSS 9.9; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2018-1061 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.9EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationNo fix on record since 2018: check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 5.0%CVSS: 9.9Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018 — use a compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and check the vendor's advisory.

A vulnerability in the role-based resource checking functionality of the Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) Director could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to view unauthorized information for any virtual machine in the UCS Director end-user portal and perform any permitted operations on any virtual machine. The permitted operations can be configured for the end user on the virtual machines with either of the following settings: The virtual machine is associated to a Virtual Data Center (VDC) that has an end user self-service policy attached to the VDC. The end user role has VM Management Actions settings configured under User Permissions. This is a global configuration, so all the virtual machines visible in the end-user portal will have the VM management actions available. The vulnerability is due to improper user authentication checks. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by logging in to the UCS Director with a modified username and valid password. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to gain visibility into and perform actions against all virtual machines in the UCS Director end-user portal of the affected system. This vulnerability affects Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) Director releases 6.0 and 6.5 prior to patch 3 that are in a default configuration. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvh53501.

CVSS v3
9.9
EG Score
9.9CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
47
EG Risk 47/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity99% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.9 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation5.0% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule.
EPSS PROB
5.0%
EPSS %ILE
92nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.9 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.9 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
5.0% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2018. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

April 19, 2018

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Nov 6, 2026
No fix on record since 2018.
Web page

Cisco UCS Director Virtual Machine Information Disclosure Vulnerability for End User Portal

https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20180418-uscd
Web page

PSIRT.COM — Product Security Incident Response Team

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103919

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 57× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 242 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 142 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 05:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 05:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  3. 2026-11-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  4. 2026-11-12 03:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 03:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  6. 2026-11-11 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  7. 2026-11-11 02:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-11 02:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  9. 2026-11-10 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  10. 2026-11-10 00:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-10 00:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  12. 2026-11-09 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  13. 2026-11-08 23:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-08 23:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  15. 2026-11-08 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  16. 2026-11-07 22:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-07 22:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  18. 2026-11-07 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  19. 2026-11-06 20:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-06 20:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  21. 2026-11-06 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  22. 2026-11-05 19:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-05 19:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  24. 2026-11-05 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  25. 2026-11-04 17:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-04 17:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  2. 2026-11-04 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  3. 2026-11-03 16:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-03 16:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  5. 2026-11-03 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  6. 2026-11-02 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  7. 2026-11-02 15:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-02 15:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  9. 2026-11-01 13:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-01 13:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  11. 2026-10-31 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-31 12:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-10-31 12:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  14. 2026-10-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-30 10:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-30 10:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  17. 2026-10-29 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  18. 2026-10-29 09:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-29 09:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  20. 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-28 08:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-28 08:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  23. 2026-10-27 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  24. 2026-10-27 06:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-27 06:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  26. 2026-10-26 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  27. 2026-10-26 01:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  28. 2026-10-25 19:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  30. 2026-10-25 00:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-25 00:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  32. 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  33. 2026-10-23 23:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-23 23:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  35. 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  36. 2026-10-22 21:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-22 21:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  38. 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  39. 2026-10-21 20:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-21 20:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  41. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  42. 2026-10-20 18:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-20 18:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  44. 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  45. 2026-10-19 17:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-19 17:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  47. 2026-10-19 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  48. 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  49. 2026-10-18 16:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  50. 2026-10-18 10:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-17 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  52. 2026-10-17 14:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-17 14:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  54. 2026-10-16 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  55. 2026-10-16 13:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-16 13:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  57. 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  58. 2026-10-15 11:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-15 11:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  60. 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  61. 2026-10-14 07:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-10-14 07:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  63. 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  64. 2026-10-13 02:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jr59-qj3r-wcp8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  65. 2026-10-12 20:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  67. 2026-10-12 00:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-10-11 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  69. 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  70. 2026-10-09 20:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 92nd percentile
  71. 2026-10-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 91st percentile
  72. 2026-10-07 23:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 91st percentile
  73. 2026-10-06 15:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 91st percentile
  74. 2026-10-05 17:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 91st percentile
  75. 2026-10-04 23:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.0% · 91st percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2018-0238?
CVE-2018-0238 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on April 19, 2018. A vulnerability in the role-based resource checking functionality of the Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) Director could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to view unauthorized information for any virtual machine in the UCS Director end-user portal and perform any permitted operations on…
When was CVE-2018-0238 made public?
CVE-2018-0238 was made public on April 19, 2018: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Cisco Systems, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on April 19, 2018. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2018-0238 actively exploited?
CVE-2018-0238 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 5.0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (92nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2018-0238?
CVE-2018-0238 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.9 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2018-0238?
No fix for CVE-2018-0238 has been recorded since its CVE record was published in 2018. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and check the vendor's advisory for a fix.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2018-0238

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2018-0238?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.