CVE-2018-0037

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2022-05-13. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2018-0861 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 3.7%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue: 15.1F6-S10, 15.1R6-S6, 15.1R7 and all subsequent releases (from the CVE record's solution, Juniper Networks, Inc.) — apply it.

Junos OS routing protocol daemon (RPD) process may crash and restart or may lead to remote code execution while processing specific BGP NOTIFICATION messages. By continuously sending crafted BGP NOTIFICATION messages, an attacker can repeatedly crash the RPD process causing a sustained Denial of Service. Due to design improvements, this issue does not affect Junos OS 16.1R1, and all subsequent releases. This issue only affects the receiving BGP device and is non-transitive in nature. Affected releases are Juniper Networks Junos OS: 15.1F5 versions starting from 15.1F5-S7 and all subsequent releases; 15.1F6 versions starting from 15.1F6-S3 and later releases prior to 15.1F6-S10; 15.1F7 versions 15.1 versions starting from 15.1R5 and later releases, including the Service Releases based on 15.1R5 and on 15.1R6 prior to 15.1R6-S6 and 15.1R7;

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
46
EG Risk 46/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation3.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue: 15.1F6-S10, 15.1R6-S6, 15.1R7 and all subsequent releases (from the CVE record's solution, Juniper Networks, Inc.). Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
3.7%
EPSS %ILE
89th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
3.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue: 15.1F6-S10, 15.1R6-S6, 15.1R7 and all subsequent releases (from the CVE record's solution, Juniper Networks, Inc.). Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 11, 2018

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Oct 7, 2026
Fix named in the CVE record's solution (Juniper Networks, Inc.).

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 55× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 244 rows on record for this CVE, as 99 entries (1 repeat merged).

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 144 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 02:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 02:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  4. 2026-11-11 23:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-11 23:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-11-11 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  7. 2026-11-10 21:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-10 21:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-11-10 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  10. 2026-11-09 18:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-09 18:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-09 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  13. 2026-11-08 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  14. 2026-11-08 16:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-08 16:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-11-07 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  17. 2026-11-07 13:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-07 13:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-11-06 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  20. 2026-11-06 11:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-06 11:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-11-05 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  23. 2026-11-05 09:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-05 09:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-11-04 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-11-04 06:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-04 06:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-03 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  4. 2026-11-03 04:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-03 04:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-11-02 02:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-02 02:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-11-01 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  9. 2026-10-31 23:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-10-31 23:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-10-31 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  12. 2026-10-30 21:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-10-30 21:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  14. 2026-10-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  15. 2026-10-29 19:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-29 19:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-10-29 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  18. 2026-10-28 16:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-28 16:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  21. 2026-10-27 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  22. 2026-10-27 14:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-27 14:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-10-26 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  25. 2026-10-25 19:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  27. 2026-10-25 09:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-25 09:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  29. 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  30. 2026-10-24 06:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-24 06:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  32. 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  33. 2026-10-23 04:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-23 04:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  35. 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  36. 2026-10-22 02:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-22 02:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  38. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  39. 2026-10-20 23:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-20 23:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  41. 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  42. 2026-10-19 21:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-19 21:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  44. 2026-10-19 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  45. 2026-10-18 18:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-18 18:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  47. 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  48. 2026-10-18 10:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  51. 2026-10-17 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  52. 2026-10-16 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  53. 2026-10-16 14:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-16 14:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  55. 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  56. 2026-10-15 11:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-15 11:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  58. 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  59. 2026-10-14 07:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-14 07:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  61. 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  62. 2026-10-13 02:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g6hq-jqj4-2fv5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  63. 2026-10-12 20:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  65. 2026-10-12 00:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-11 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  67. 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  68. 2026-10-09 20:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  69. 2026-10-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  70. 2026-10-07 23:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  71. 2026-10-06 15:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  72. 2026-10-05 17:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  73. 2026-10-04 23:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile
  74. 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.7% · 89th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2018-0037?
CVE-2018-0037 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 11, 2018. Junos OS routing protocol daemon (RPD) process may crash and restart or may lead to remote code execution while processing specific BGP NOTIFICATION messages. By continuously sending crafted BGP NOTIFICATION messages, an attacker can repeatedly crash the RPD process causing a sustained Denial of…
When was CVE-2018-0037 made public?
CVE-2018-0037 was made public on July 11, 2018: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Juniper Networks, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on July 11, 2018. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2018-0037 actively exploited?
CVE-2018-0037 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 3.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (89th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2018-0037?
CVE-2018-0037 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2018-0037?
The CVE record's solution for CVE-2018-0037, written by its CNA Juniper Networks, Inc., names the fix: "The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue: 15.1F6-S10, 15.1R6-S6, 15.1R7 and all subsequent releases."

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2018-0037

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2018-0037?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.