CVE-2017-9855

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2022-05-13. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2017-18765 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationNo fix on record since 2017: if the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names within your standard update timelines; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system on your normal schedule, or retire the product (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.6%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2017 — if the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names; if not, isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product.

An issue was discovered in SMA Solar Technology products. A secondary authentication system is available for Installers called the Grid Guard system. This system uses predictable codes, and a single Grid Guard code can be used on any SMA inverter. Any such code, when combined with the installer account, allows changing very sensitive parameters. NOTE: the vendor reports that Grid Guard is not an authentication feature; it is only a tracing feature. Also, only Sunny Boy TLST-21 and TL-21 and Sunny Tripower TL-10 and TL-30 could potentially be affected

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
45
EG Risk 45/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation1.6% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2017. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names within your standard update timelines; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) on your normal schedule, or retire the product.
EPSS PROB
1.6%
EPSS %ILE
75th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
1.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix has been recorded since the CVE record was published in 2017. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names within your standard update timelines; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) on your normal schedule, or retire the product.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 5, 2017

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Oct 17, 2026
No fix on record since 2017.
Web page

CVE-Information for the 1.0 original horusscenario – Horus Scenario

https://horusscenario.com/CVE-information/

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 63× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 288 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 188 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 22:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-12 22:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  4. 2026-11-12 01:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 01:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-11-11 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  7. 2026-11-11 03:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-11 03:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-11-10 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  10. 2026-11-10 05:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-10 05:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-09 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  13. 2026-11-09 07:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-09 07:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-11-08 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  16. 2026-11-08 09:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-08 09:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-11-07 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  19. 2026-11-07 11:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-07 11:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-11-06 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  22. 2026-11-06 14:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-06 14:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-11-05 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  25. 2026-11-05 16:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-04 18:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-04 18:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-04 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  4. 2026-11-03 20:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-03 20:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-11-03 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  7. 2026-11-02 22:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-02 22:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-11-02 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  10. 2026-11-02 00:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-02 00:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-01 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  13. 2026-11-01 02:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-01 02:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-10-31 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  16. 2026-10-31 05:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-31 05:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-10-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  19. 2026-10-30 07:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-30 07:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-10-29 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  22. 2026-10-29 09:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-29 09:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  25. 2026-10-28 11:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-28 11:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-10-27 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  28. 2026-10-27 13:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-27 13:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  30. 2026-10-26 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  31. 2026-10-26 15:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-26 15:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  33. 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  34. 2026-10-25 16:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-25 16:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  36. 2026-10-24 18:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-24 18:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  38. 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  39. 2026-10-23 20:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-23 20:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  41. 2026-10-23 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  42. 2026-10-22 22:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-22 22:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  44. 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  45. 2026-10-22 00:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-22 00:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  47. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  48. 2026-10-21 02:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-21 02:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  50. 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  51. 2026-10-20 04:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-20 04:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  53. 2026-10-19 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  54. 2026-10-19 05:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-19 05:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  56. 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  57. 2026-10-18 07:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-18 07:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  59. 2026-10-17 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  60. 2026-10-17 09:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-17 09:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  62. 2026-10-16 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  63. 2026-10-16 11:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-16 11:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  65. 2026-10-15 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  66. 2026-10-15 11:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-10-15 11:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  68. 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 75th percentile
  69. 2026-10-14 07:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-14 07:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  71. 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 74th percentile
  72. 2026-10-13 02:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v4m3-hw9h-pqgx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  73. 2026-10-12 20:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.6% · 74th percentile
  75. 2026-10-12 00:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2017-9855?
CVE-2017-9855 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 5, 2017. An issue was discovered in SMA Solar Technology products. A secondary authentication system is available for Installers called the Grid Guard system. This system uses predictable codes, and a single Grid Guard code can be used on any SMA inverter. Any such code, when combined with the installer…
When was CVE-2017-9855 made public?
CVE-2017-9855 was made public on August 5, 2017: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, MITRE Corporation, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on August 5, 2017. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of June 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2017-9855 actively exploited?
CVE-2017-9855 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (75th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2017-9855?
CVE-2017-9855 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2017-9855?
No fix for CVE-2017-9855 has been recorded since its CVE record was published in 2017. If the vendor still supports the product, apply the fixed version it names; if it no longer does, isolate the affected system (restrict network access to it, for example with a firewall, or keep it off the internet) or retire the product.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2017-9855

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2017-9855?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.