CVE-2017-20198

CRITICALNVD 9.39.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.3 under NVD CVSS. EPSS exploit probability: 1.3% (71st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS
Weaponized

Also known asEUVD-2017-18916 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationNo fix is confirmed yet: check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Public exploit code is available (Metasploit)
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.3%CVSS: 9.3Exploit: MetasploitExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

The CVE record's CNA (VulnCheck) lists D2iQ, Inc. DC/OS Marathon versions before 1.9.0 as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.

The Marathon UI in DC/OS < 1.9.0 allows unauthenticated users to deploy arbitrary Docker containers. Due to improper restriction of volume mount configurations, attackers can deploy a container that mounts the host's root filesystem (/) with read/write privileges. When using a malicious Docker image, the attacker can write to /etc/cron.d/ on the host, achieving arbitrary code execution with root privileges. This impacts any system where the Docker daemon honors Marathon container configurations without policy enforcement.

CVSS
9.3
EG Score
9.3CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
83
EG Risk 83/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity93% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation65% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 2 (Weaponized): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
1.3%
EPSS %ILE
71st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.3 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS
EG Likelihood
1.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

No fix is confirmed yet. Check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 23, 2025

Last Modified

April 15, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Sep 15, 2026
No fix on record yet.
Web page

DC/OS < 1.9.0 Marathon UI Unauthenticated RCE via Docker Mount Abuse | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/dcos-marathon-docker-mount-abuse-rce
Web page

DC/OS Marathon UI - Docker (Metasploit) - Python remote Exploit

https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42134
Web page

Compromise a DCOS Server through a Docker Container | War Room

https://web.archive.org/web/20230609134421/https://warroom.rsmus.com/dcos-marathon-compromise/
Web page

The Definitive Platform for Modern Apps | DC/OS

https://dcos.io/

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 58× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 236 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 136 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 03:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 03:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  3. 2026-11-12 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 71st percentile
  4. 2026-11-12 03:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 03:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  6. 2026-11-11 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 71st percentile
  7. 2026-11-11 02:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-11 02:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  9. 2026-11-10 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  10. 2026-11-10 02:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-10 02:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  12. 2026-11-09 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  13. 2026-11-09 01:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-09 01:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  15. 2026-11-08 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  16. 2026-11-08 01:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-08 01:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  18. 2026-11-07 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  19. 2026-11-07 00:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-07 00:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  21. 2026-11-06 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  22. 2026-11-06 00:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-06 00:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  24. 2026-11-05 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  25. 2026-11-05 00:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 00:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  2. 2026-11-04 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  3. 2026-11-03 23:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-03 23:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  5. 2026-11-03 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  6. 2026-11-02 23:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-02 23:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  8. 2026-11-02 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  9. 2026-11-01 22:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-01 22:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  11. 2026-10-31 22:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-10-31 22:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  13. 2026-10-31 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  14. 2026-10-30 22:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-30 22:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  16. 2026-10-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  17. 2026-10-29 21:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-29 21:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  19. 2026-10-29 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  20. 2026-10-28 21:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-28 21:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  22. 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  23. 2026-10-27 20:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-27 20:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  25. 2026-10-27 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  26. 2026-10-26 20:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-26 20:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  28. 2026-10-26 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  29. 2026-10-25 18:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-25 18:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  31. 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  32. 2026-10-24 17:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-24 17:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  34. 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 70th percentile
  35. 2026-10-23 16:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-23 16:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  37. 2026-10-23 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  38. 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  39. 2026-10-22 16:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-22 16:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  41. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  42. 2026-10-21 15:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-21 15:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  44. 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  45. 2026-10-20 14:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-20 14:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  47. 2026-10-19 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  48. 2026-10-19 13:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-19 13:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  50. 2026-10-18 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  51. 2026-10-18 13:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  52. 2026-10-18 10:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-17 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  54. 2026-10-17 13:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-17 13:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  56. 2026-10-16 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  57. 2026-10-16 12:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-16 12:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  59. 2026-10-15 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  60. 2026-10-15 12:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-15 12:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  62. 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  63. 2026-10-14 07:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-14 07:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  65. 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 68th percentile
  66. 2026-10-13 02:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-24rw-3m8c-crv2 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  67. 2026-10-12 20:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-10-12 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  69. 2026-10-12 00:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-11 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  71. 2026-10-10 19:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  72. 2026-10-09 20:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  73. 2026-10-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  74. 2026-10-07 23:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile
  75. 2026-10-06 15:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 65th percentile

Publicly available exploits

(1 reference)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module). No fix is confirmed yet, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly until one is published.

  • Metasploitexploit/linux/http/dcos_marathon✓ verified
    Published Jun 6, 2017

    DC/OS Marathon UI Docker Exploit

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2017-20198?
CVE-2017-20198 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 23, 2025. The Marathon UI in DC/OS < 1.9.0 allows unauthenticated users to deploy arbitrary Docker containers. Due to improper restriction of volume mount configurations, attackers can deploy a container that mounts the host's root filesystem (/) with read/write privileges. When using a malicious Docker…
When was CVE-2017-20198 made public?
CVE-2017-20198 was made public on June 7, 2017: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on July 23, 2025. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of April 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2017-20198 actively exploited?
CVE-2017-20198 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. EchelonGraph's EG-KEV model places it in Tier 2 (Weaponized), which is not evidence of exploitation: a Metasploit module exists for it. EchelonGraph does not test whether exploit code works. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (71st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2017-20198?
CVE-2017-20198 has a CVSS base score of 9.3 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2017-20198?
No fix for CVE-2017-20198 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch for a fix. The CVE record's CNA (VulnCheck) lists D2iQ, Inc. DC/OS Marathon versions before 1.9.0 as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2017-20198

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2017-20198?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.