CVE-2017-15095

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2018-10-18. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2018-0610 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-h592-38cm-4ggp (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 8.4%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A deserialization flaw was discovered in the jackson-databind in versions before 2.8.10 and 2.9.1, which could allow an unauthenticated user to perform code execution by sending the maliciously crafted input to the readValue method of the ObjectMapper. This issue extends the previous flaw CVE-2017-7525 by blacklisting more classes that could be used maliciously.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
75
EG Risk 75/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
8.4%
EPSS %ILE
95th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
8.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

February 6, 2018

Last Modified

October 8, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Nov 8, 2026
Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0479
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0478
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0342
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3190
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3189
Web page

PSIRT.COM — Product Security Incident Response Team

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103880

Patch Availability(19)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulibjackson-json-java-doc (1.9.2-7ubuntu0.2) @ xenial2026-11-11ubuntu
redhatjackson-databind2019-11-14redhat
redhatopenshift3/ose-logging-elasticsearch5:v3.11.153-22019-10-18redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-logging-elasticsearch5:v4.1.18-2019092019152019-09-27redhat
redhatyaml-cpp-0:0.5.1-7.el7sat2018-10-16redhat
redhatpicketbox-0:4.1.7-1.Final_redhat_1.1.ep6.el52018-05-14redhat
redhatpicketbox-0:4.1.7-1.Final_redhat_1.1.ep6.el72018-05-14redhat
redhatjboss-ec2-eap-0:7.5.20-1.Final_redhat_1.ep6.el62018-05-14redhat
redhatpicketbox-0:4.1.7-1.Final_redhat_1.1.ep6.el62018-05-14redhat
redhateap7-xml-security-0:2.0.9-1.redhat_1.1.ep7.el72018-03-12redhat
redhateap7-xml-security-0:2.0.9-1.redhat_1.1.ep7.el62018-03-12redhat
redhateap7-jboss-ec2-eap-0:7.1.1-3.1.GA_redhat_3.ep7.el72018-03-12redhat
redhatrh-maven35-jackson-databind-0:2.7.6-2.4.el72018-02-22redhat
redhatrh-eclipse47-jackson-databind-0:2.7.6-3.3.el72017-11-13redhat
redhatrh-eclipse46-jackson-databind-0:2.6.3-2.4.el72017-11-13redhat
mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind @ 2.9.4 (fixes >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.4)—ghsa
mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind @ 2.8.11 (fixes >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.11)—ghsa
mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind @ 2.6.7.3 (fixes >= 2.0.0, < 2.6.7.3)—ghsa
mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind @ 2.7.9.2 (fixes >= 2.7.0, < 2.7.9.2)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(13 across 7 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind—
  • every version up to 2.9.1-1: fixed in 2.9.1-1
—
libjackson-json-java—
  • every version up to 1.9.13-2: fixed in 1.9.13-2
—
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind—
  • every version up to 2.9.1-1: fixed in 2.9.1-1
—
libjackson-json-java—
  • every version up to 1.9.13-2: fixed in 1.9.13-2
—
Debian:13(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind—
  • every version up to 2.9.1-1: fixed in 2.9.1-1
—
libjackson-json-java—
  • every version up to 1.9.13-2: fixed in 1.9.13-2
—
Debian:14(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind—
  • every version up to 2.9.1-1: fixed in 2.9.1-1
—
libjackson-json-java—
  • every version up to 1.9.13-2: fixed in 1.9.13-2
—
Debian:8(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind2.4.2-2, 2.4.2-2+deb8u1
  • every version up to 2.4.2-2+deb8u2: fixed in 2.4.2-2+deb8u2
—
libjackson-json-java1.9.2-3
  • every version up to 1.9.2-3+deb8u1: fixed in 1.9.2-3+deb8u1
—
Debian:9(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
jackson-databind2.8.6-1, 2.8.6-1+deb9u1
  • every version up to 2.8.6-1+deb9u2: fixed in 2.8.6-1+deb9u2
—
libjackson-json-java1.9.2-8
  • every version up to 1.9.2-8+deb9u1: fixed in 1.9.2-8+deb9u1
—
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.7.0 ... 2.7.9.1 (12 versions)
  • 2.8.0 up to 2.8.11: fixed in 2.8.11
  • 2.9.0 up to 2.9.4: fixed in 2.9.4
  • 2.0.0 up to 2.6.7.3: fixed in 2.6.7.3
  • 2.7.0 up to 2.7.9.2: fixed in 2.7.9.2
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(11)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 69× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 251 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 151 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 18:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-12 18:38 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-12 18:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h592-38cm-4ggp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-12 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 95th percentile
  5. 2026-11-11 17:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-11 17:42 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-11 17:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h592-38cm-4ggp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-11-11 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 95th percentile
  9. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h592-38cm-4ggp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-10 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 95th percentile
  13. 2026-11-09 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  14. 2026-11-09 16:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-09 16:15 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-09 16:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h592-38cm-4ggp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-11-08 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  18. 2026-11-08 15:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-08 15:13 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-08 15:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h592-38cm-4ggp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-11-07 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  22. 2026-11-07 14:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-07 14:17 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-11-07 14:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h592-38cm-4ggp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-11-06 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-06 13:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-06 13:21 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-06 13:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h592-38cm-4ggp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-05 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  5. 2026-11-05 12:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-05 12:25 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-05 12:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h592-38cm-4ggp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-11-04 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  9. 2026-11-04 11:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-04 11:29 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-04 11:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h592-38cm-4ggp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-03 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  13. 2026-11-03 10:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-03 10:33 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-03 10:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h592-38cm-4ggp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-11-02 14:55 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-11-02 09:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-02 09:26 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-02 09:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h592-38cm-4ggp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-11-01 08:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-01 08:30 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-11-01 08:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h592-38cm-4ggp · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-10-31 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  24. 2026-10-31 07:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-31 07:34 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  27. 2026-10-30 06:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-30 06:37 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-29 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  30. 2026-10-29 05:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-29 05:42 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-28 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  33. 2026-10-28 04:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-28 04:45 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-27 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  36. 2026-10-27 03:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-27 03:49 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-26 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  39. 2026-10-25 22:39 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-25 19:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  42. 2026-10-24 21:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-24 21:43 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  45. 2026-10-23 20:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-23 20:47 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-23 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  48. 2026-10-22 19:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-22 19:52 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  51. 2026-10-21 18:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-21 18:56 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  54. 2026-10-20 17:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-20 17:58 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  57. 2026-10-19 17:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-19 17:00 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-19 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  60. 2026-10-18 16:02 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-18 10:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-10-17 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  63. 2026-10-17 15:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-17 15:00 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-16 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  66. 2026-10-16 14:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-10-16 14:03 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-15 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  69. 2026-10-15 12:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-15 12:29 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  72. 2026-10-14 07:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-14 07:53 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-13 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.4% · 94th percentile
  75. 2026-10-13 03:05 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2017-15095?
CVE-2017-15095 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on February 6, 2018. A deserialization flaw was discovered in the jackson-databind in versions before 2.8.10 and 2.9.1, which could allow an unauthenticated user to perform code execution by sending the maliciously crafted input to the readValue method of the ObjectMapper. This issue extends the previous flaw…
When was CVE-2017-15095 made public?
CVE-2017-15095 was made public on June 27, 2017: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Red Hat, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on February 6, 2018. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 8, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2017-15095 actively exploited?
CVE-2017-15095 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 8.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (95th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2017-15095?
CVE-2017-15095 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2017-15095?
A fix for CVE-2017-15095 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2017-15095 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2017-15095

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2017-15095?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.