CVE-2016-9652

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 2.1% (81st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2016-10453 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 2.1%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Google Chrome before 55.0.2883.75.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
45
EG Risk 45/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation2.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
2.1%
EPSS %ILE
81st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
2.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 20, 2019

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Oct 7, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 24 Update: qt5-qtwebengine-5.6.3-0.1.20170712gitee719ad313e564.fc24 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LV2U7SINGF3SBK7HVKSWFOYLQBUH6PUE/
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 25 Update: chromium-55.0.2883.87-1.fc25 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7LGZO2VOGJOZUUXNQITD6YMIUQ2L5GTU/
Web page

Chrome Releases: Stable Channel Update for Desktop

https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2016/12/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html
Web page

[SECURITY] [DSA 3731-1] chromium-browser security update

http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3731
Web page

CVE-2016-9651 - PSIRT.COM

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94633

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2016-9652(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuliboxideqtcore0 (1.19.4-0ubuntu0.16.10.1) @ yakkety2026-11-12ubuntu
redhatchromium-browser-0:55.0.2883.75-1.el62016-12-07redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:8(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
chromium-browser41.0.2272.118-1 ... 54.0.2840.101-1 (76 versions)
  • every version up to 55.0.2883.75-1~deb8u1: fixed in 55.0.2883.75-1~deb8u1
—

Additional Vendor Advisories

(1)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 90× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 277 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 177 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 23:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-12 23:39 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-12 23:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  4. 2026-11-12 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  5. 2026-11-12 00:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-12 00:49 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-12 00:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  8. 2026-11-11 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  9. 2026-11-11 02:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-11 02:00 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-11 02:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  12. 2026-11-10 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  13. 2026-11-10 03:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-10 03:11 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-10 03:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  16. 2026-11-09 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  17. 2026-11-09 04:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-09 04:22 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-09 04:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  20. 2026-11-08 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  21. 2026-11-08 05:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-08 05:26 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-08 05:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  24. 2026-11-07 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  25. 2026-11-07 06:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-07 06:36 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-11-07 06:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  3. 2026-11-06 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  4. 2026-11-06 07:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-06 07:47 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-06 07:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  7. 2026-11-05 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  8. 2026-11-05 08:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-05 08:58 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-05 08:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  11. 2026-11-04 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  12. 2026-11-04 10:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-04 10:09 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-04 10:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  15. 2026-11-03 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  16. 2026-11-03 11:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-03 11:18 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-03 11:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  19. 2026-11-02 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  20. 2026-11-02 12:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-02 12:28 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-11-02 12:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  23. 2026-11-01 13:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-01 13:38 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-11-01 13:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  26. 2026-10-31 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  27. 2026-10-31 14:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-31 14:48 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-31 14:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  30. 2026-10-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  31. 2026-10-30 16:00 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-30 16:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  33. 2026-10-29 17:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-29 17:10 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-29 17:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  36. 2026-10-29 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  37. 2026-10-28 18:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-28 18:21 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-28 18:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  40. 2026-10-28 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  41. 2026-10-27 19:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-27 19:27 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-27 19:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  44. 2026-10-27 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  45. 2026-10-26 20:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-26 20:36 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-26 20:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  48. 2026-10-25 19:55 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-25 19:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  50. 2026-10-25 19:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-25 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  52. 2026-10-24 21:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-24 21:02 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-24 21:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  55. 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  56. 2026-10-23 22:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-23 22:13 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-23 22:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  59. 2026-10-23 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  60. 2026-10-22 23:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-22 23:20 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-22 23:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  63. 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  64. 2026-10-22 00:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-10-22 00:30 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-10-22 00:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  67. 2026-10-21 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
  68. 2026-10-21 01:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-21 01:39 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-21 01:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  71. 2026-10-20 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
  72. 2026-10-20 02:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-20 02:48 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-20 02:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch5q-r8mv-4p34 · GitHub severity HIGH
  75. 2026-10-19 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2016-9652?
CVE-2016-9652 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 20, 2019. Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Google Chrome before 55.0.2883.75.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2016-9652 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2016-9652 was published on November 20, 2019. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2016-9652 actively exploited?
CVE-2016-9652 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 2.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (81st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2016-9652?
CVE-2016-9652 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2016-9652?
A fix for CVE-2016-9652 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2016-9652 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2016-9652

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2016-9652?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.