The monitor component in sshd in OpenSSH before 7.0 on non-OpenBSD platforms accepts extraneous username data in MONITOR_REQ_PAM_INIT_CTX requests, which allows local users to conduct impersonation attacks by leveraging any SSH login access in conjunction with control of the sshd uid to send a crafted MONITOR_REQ_PWNAM request, related to monitor.c and monitor_wrap.c.
CVE-2015-6563
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score 6.4 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: LOW) published 2022-05-14. NVD baseline CVSS 6.4; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2015-6502 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-2f6c-wrfr-f7rw (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.4
- EG Score
- 6.4MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 29EG Risk 29/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity64% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.4 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.4% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 32nd
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (6.4): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.4 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 6.4 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-26). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
August 24, 2015
Last Modified
May 27, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Jul 17, 2026oss-security - Re: CVE request - OpenSSH 6.9 PAM privilege separation vulnerabilities
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/08/22/1Full Disclosure: BFS-SA-2015-002: OpenSSH PAM Privilege Separation Vulnerabilities
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Aug/54Vendor Advisories for CVE-2015-6563(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- GHSA-2f6c-wrfr-f7rwGitHub Security AdvisoriesLow
The monitor component in sshd in OpenSSH before 7.0 on non-OpenBSD platforms accepts extraneous...
- RHSA-2016:0741Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: openssh security, bug fix, and enhancement update
- RHSA-2015:2088Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: openssh security, bug fix, and enhancement update
Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | openssh-0:5.3p1-117.el6 | 2016-05-10 | redhat |
| redhat | openssh-0:6.6.1p1-22.el7 | 2015-11-19 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssh | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssh | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssh | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssh | — |
| — |
Debian:8(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssh | 1:6.7p1-5 ... 1:6.7p1-5+deb8u5 (6 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 33× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 208 rows on record for this CVE, as 97 entries (3 repeats merged).
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 3 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 108 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-12 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-11-11 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-11-10 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-11-09 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-11-08 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-11-07 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-11-06 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-11-05 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-11-04 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-11-03 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-11-02 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-11-01 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-31 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-27 10:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-27 10:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 10:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2f6c-wrfr-f7rw · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 6.4
- 2026-10-26 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-25 19:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-25 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
Show 72 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-22 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-18 11:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-17 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-16 13:24 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-15 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-12 20:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-12 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-12 01:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-30 09:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-09-28 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-24 19:46 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-23 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-05 12:00 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-04 13:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-19 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-18 22:40 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-18 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-08-03 18:27 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-01 04:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:8:openssh
- CVE-2016-1908EG 9.8EPSS p97CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-15473NVD 5.3EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-6210NVD 5.9EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-6515NVD 7.5EG 8.3EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2016-0778EG 8.1EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2015-5600EG 8.1EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2016-0777NVD 6.5EG 8.0EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2016-10012EG 7.8HIGH
- CVE-2015-8325EG 7.8HIGH
- CVE-2019-6111NVD 5.9EG 7.5EPSS p99HIGH
Same vendor
4 shownredhat:RHSA-2015:2088 · redhat:RHSA-2016:0741
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2015-6563?
When was CVE-2015-6563 made public?
Is CVE-2015-6563 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2015-6563?
How do I remediate CVE-2015-6563?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2015-6563
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2015-6563?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.