CVE-2015-0359

HIGHCVSS v2 · 10.010.0
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS v2 base score.

This CVE was only ever scored under CVSS v2.0. NVD CVSS v2.0 base 10.0 — NVD rates that HIGH (NVD's v2 bands: LOW 0.0–3.9 / MEDIUM 4.0–6.9 / HIGH 7.0–10.0; no CRITICAL band). Vector AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C. CVSS v2 is an older, coarser metric than v3.1/v4.0 (no Scope, no User Interaction, no Attack Requirements), so it is not directly comparable to a v3 or v4 score. NVD has never re-scored this record under v3. EPSS predicts 92% exploitation probability in the next 30 days; it does not lift the v2 base. EPSS sets EG Risk's exploitation input. Confidence: LOW.

Triggered by: NVD CVSS v2.0 (legacy fallback)
Sources: NVD CVSS v2.0
Weaponized

Also known asEUVD-2015-0372 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

10.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 92%
  • Public exploit code is available (Metasploit, Exploit-DB, marked verified by Exploit-DB)
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 92%CVSS v2: 10.0Exploit: Metasploit · Exploit-DB (verified)Exposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Double free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.281 and 14.x through 17.x before 17.0.0.169 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.457 on Linux allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-0346.

CVSS v2.0 (legacy)
10.0HIGHNVD never assigned a CVSS v3 rating to this CVE
EG Score
10.0HIGHlow confidence
EG Risk
82
EG Risk 82/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity100% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation92% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
92%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
10.0 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v2.0 · CVSS v2.0AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
EG Likelihood
92% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

April 14, 2015

Last Modified

May 6, 2026

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatflash-plugin-0:11.2.202.457-1.el6_62015-04-15redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

All Vendor Advisories

(1)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 0× in last 7d / 0× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-13 00:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 00:34 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-13 00:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  4. 2026-11-12 00:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 00:09 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-12 00:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  7. 2026-11-11 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  8. 2026-11-10 23:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-10 23:41 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-10 23:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  11. 2026-11-09 23:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-09 23:16 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-09 23:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  14. 2026-11-08 22:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-08 22:52 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-08 22:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  17. 2026-11-07 22:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-07 22:27 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-07 22:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  20. 2026-11-06 22:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-06 22:02 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-11-06 22:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  23. 2026-11-05 21:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-05 21:37 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-11-05 21:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-04 21:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-04 21:02 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-04 21:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  4. 2026-11-04 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  5. 2026-11-03 20:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-03 20:36 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-03 20:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  8. 2026-11-02 20:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-02 20:11 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-02 20:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  11. 2026-11-01 19:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-01 19:43 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-01 19:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  14. 2026-10-31 19:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-31 19:18 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-31 19:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  17. 2026-10-30 18:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-30 18:54 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-30 18:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  20. 2026-10-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  21. 2026-10-29 18:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-29 18:29 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-29 18:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  24. 2026-10-25 19:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-25 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  26. 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  27. 2026-10-21 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  28. 2026-10-18 11:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-14 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  30. 2026-10-13 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  31. 2026-10-12 21:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-12 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  33. 2026-10-12 01:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  35. 2026-10-06 15:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  36. 2026-10-05 17:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  37. 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  38. 2026-09-30 09:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-09-17 19:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  40. 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  41. 2026-09-10 09:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  42. 2026-09-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  43. 2026-09-05 15:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  44. 2026-08-30 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  45. 2026-08-27 14:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  46. 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  47. 2026-08-15 01:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  48. 2026-08-09 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  49. 2026-08-04 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  50. 2026-08-02 02:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  51. 2026-07-28 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  52. 2026-07-26 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 92% · 99th percentile
  53. 2026-07-26 13:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 10.0 HIGH
  54. 2026-07-26 01:33 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-07-26 01:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  56. 2026-07-26 01:31 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-07-26 01:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  58. 2026-07-26 01:30 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-07-26 01:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  60. 2026-07-26 01:29 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-07-26 01:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  62. 2026-07-26 01:28 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-07-26 01:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  64. 2026-07-26 01:27 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-07-26 01:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  66. 2026-07-26 01:26 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-07-26 01:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  68. 2026-07-26 01:25 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-07-26 01:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  70. 2026-07-26 01:24 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-07-26 01:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  72. 2026-07-26 01:23 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-07-26 01:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH
  74. 2026-07-26 01:22 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-07-26 01:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7vvf-ghq4-pw24 · GitHub severity HIGH

Publicly available exploits

(2 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 1 Exploit-DB entry). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Exploit-DBEDB-36956✓ verified
    Published May 8, 2015

    Adobe Flash Player - domainMemory ByteArray Use-After-Free (Metasploit)

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitexploit/windows/browser/adobe_flash_domain_memory_uaf✓ verified
    Published May 7, 2015

    Adobe Flash Player domainMemory ByteArray Use After Free

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2015-0359?
CVE-2015-0359 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on April 14, 2015. Double free vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player before 13.0.0.281 and 14.x through 17.x before 17.0.0.169 on Windows and OS X and before 11.2.202.457 on Linux allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-0346.
When was CVE-2015-0359 made public?
CVE-2015-0359 was made public on April 14, 2015: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Adobe Systems Incorporated, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on April 14, 2015. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of May 6, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2015-0359 actively exploited?
CVE-2015-0359 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. EchelonGraph's EG-KEV model places it in Tier 2 (Weaponized), which is not evidence of exploitation: a Metasploit module exists for it, and Exploit-DB marks a public exploit for it as verified. EchelonGraph does not test whether exploit code works. FIRST EPSS estimates a 92% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2015-0359?
A fix for CVE-2015-0359 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2015-0359

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2015-0359?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.