GNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution, aka "ShellShock." NOTE: the original fix for this issue was incorrect; CVE-2014-7169 has been assigned to cover the vulnerability that is still present after the incorrect fix.
CVE-2014-6271
Score elevated to 9.8 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-01-28), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV)
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8(high)
- EG Risk
- 99(Act)EG Risk 99/100SSVC: Act
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity98% × 45%Exploitation100% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Fix now — active exploitation, automatable, high impact. - EPSS PROB
- 100%
- EPSS %ILE
- 100%
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
Published
September 24, 2014
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
Advisory Details (6)
Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026lcamtuf's old blog: Quick notes about the bash bug, its impact, and the fixes so far
http://lcamtuf.blogspot.com/2014/09/quick-notes-about-bash-bug-its-impact.htmlJVN#55667175: QNAP QTS vulnerable to OS command injection
http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN55667175/index.htmlMageia Advisory: MGASA-2014-0388 - Updated bash packages fix CVE-2014-6271
http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0388.htmlVendor Advisories for CVE-2014-6271(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(5)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | bash-static (4.3-7ubuntu1.1) @ trusty | 2026-09-19 | ubuntu |
| redhat | rhev-hypervisor6-0:6.5-20140930.1.el6ev | 2014-10-02 | redhat |
| redhat | bash-0:4.1.2-15.el6_4.1 | 2014-09-24 | redhat |
| redhat | bash-0:4.1.2-15.el6_5.1.sjis.1 | 2014-09-24 | redhat |
| redhat | bash-0:4.2.45-5.el7_0.2 | 2014-09-24 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(6 across 6 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| bash | — | 4.3-9.1 | — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| bash | — | 4.3-9.1 | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| bash | — | 4.3-9.1 | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| bash | — | 4.3-9.1 | — |
Debian:6.0(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| bash | 4.1-3 | 4.1-3+deb6u1 | — |
Debian:7(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| bash | 4.2+dfsg-0.1 | 4.2+dfsg-0.1+deb7u1 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(4)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 84× in last 7d / 356× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 1,332 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-09-19 13:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 13:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-19 09:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 09:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-19 05:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 05:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-19 00:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 00:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 20:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 20:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 19:20 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-18 16:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 16:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 14:15 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-18 12:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 12:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 08:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 08:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 03:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 03:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 23:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 23:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 19:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 19:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 15:12 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-17 15:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 11:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 11:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 06:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 06:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 02:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 02:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 22:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 22:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 18:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 18:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 14:10 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-16 13:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 13:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 09:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 09:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 05:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 05:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 01:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 01:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-15 21:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 21:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-15 16:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 16:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-15 12:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 12:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-15 08:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 08:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-15 04:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-15 00:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 00:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-14 19:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 19:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-14 19:24 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-14 15:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 15:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-14 11:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 11:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-14 07:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 07:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-14 03:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 03:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-13 22:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 22:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-13 18:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 18:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-13 14:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 14:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-13 10:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 10:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-13 06:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 06:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-13 01:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 01:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-12 21:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 21:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-12 17:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 17:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-12 13:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 13:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-12 09:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 09:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-12 04:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 04:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-12 00:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 00:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-11 20:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 20:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-11 18:49 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-11 16:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 16:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-11 12:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 12:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-11 07:51 UTCVendor advisory
Publicly available exploits
(10 references)Working exploit code is in the public domain (1 Metasploit module) (3 GitHub PoCs) (6 Exploit-DB entries). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly — public PoCs typically lead to mass-exploitation within 24-72 hours.
- GitHub PoCJ0hnTh3Kn1ght/CVE-2014-6271First seen Jul 1, 2023
Exploitation of "Shellshock" Vulnerability. Remote code execution in Apache with mod_cgi
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCb4keSn4ke/CVE-2014-6271First seen Jul 29, 2021
Shellshock exploit aka CVE-2014-6271
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-42938✓ verifiedFirst seen Oct 2, 2017
Qmail SMTP - Bash Environment Variable Injection (Metasploit)
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-40938✓ verifiedFirst seen Dec 18, 2016
RedStar 3.0 Server - 'Shellshock' 'BEAM' / 'RSSMON' Command Injection
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCopsxcq/exploit-CVE-2014-6271First seen Dec 7, 2016
Shellshock exploit + vulnerable environment
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-40619First seen Oct 21, 2016
TrendMicro InterScan Web Security Virtual Appliance - 'Shellshock' Remote Command Injection
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-39918✓ verifiedFirst seen Jun 10, 2016
IPFire - 'Shellshock' Bash Environment Variable Command Injection (Metasploit)
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-38849✓ verifiedFirst seen Dec 2, 2015
Advantech Switch - 'Shellshock' Bash Environment Variable Command Injection (Metasploit)
Open source ↗ - Metasploitexploit/linux/http/advantech_switch_bash_env_exec✓ verifiedFirst seen Dec 1, 2015
Advantech Switch Bash Environment Variable Code Injection (Shellshock)
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-37816First seen Aug 18, 2015
Cisco Unified Communications Manager - Multiple Vulnerabilities
Open source ↗
Past incidents using this CVE
(1)This CVE was central to one or more publicly-documented breaches. Each card links to authoritative reporting at the time of the incident.
- Shellshock (bash)Sep 2014
GNU bash environment-variable parsing flaw allowed remote command execution via CGI scripts, SSH, DHCP and Git. Affected millions of Unix systems.
Source: The Register
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat
- CVE-2001-0825EG 10.0HIGH
- CVE-2001-1009EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2001-0554EG 10.0EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2001-1162EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0414EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2001-0191EG 10.0EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2001-0301EG 10.0EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2001-0197EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0233EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0010EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-78
- CVE-2009-20011EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2011-10017EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2012-1166EG 10.0EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2012-2976EG 10.0EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2012-2953EG 10.0EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2011-4502EG 10.0EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2011-2148EG 10.0EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2011-0382EG 10.0EPSS p90HIGH
- CVE-2011-0381EG 10.0EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2011-0372EG 10.0HIGH
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2014-6271?
When was CVE-2014-6271 disclosed?
Is CVE-2014-6271 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2014-6271?
Which products are affected by CVE-2014-6271?
How do I remediate CVE-2014-6271?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2014-6271
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2014-6271?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.