CVE-2013-1478

HIGHCVSS v2 · 10.010.0
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS v2 base score.

This CVE was only ever scored under CVSS v2.0. NVD CVSS v2.0 base 10.0 — NVD rates that HIGH (NVD's v2 bands: LOW 0.0–3.9 / MEDIUM 4.0–6.9 / HIGH 7.0–10.0; no CRITICAL band). Vector AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C. CVSS v2 is an older, coarser metric than v3.1/v4.0 (no Scope, no User Interaction, no Attack Requirements), so it is not directly comparable to a v3 or v4 score. NVD has never re-scored this record under v3. EPSS predicts 7.6% exploitation probability in the next 30 days; it does not lift the v2 base. EPSS sets EG Risk's exploitation input. Confidence: LOW.

Triggered by: NVD CVSS v2.0 (legacy fallback)
Sources: NVD CVSS v2.0

Also known asEUVD-2013-1514 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-84c5-rhrc-rq9v (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

10.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 7.6%CVSS v2: 10.0Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 through Update 11, 6 through Update 38, 5.0 through Update 38, and 1.4.2_40 and earlier, and OpenJDK 6 and 7, allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to 2D. NOTE: the previous information is from the February 2013 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from another vendor that this issue is related to "insufficient validation of raster parameters" that can trigger an integer overflow and memory corruption.

CVSS v2.0 (legacy)
10.0HIGHNVD never assigned a CVSS v3 rating to this CVE
EG Score
10.0HIGHlow confidence
EG Risk
48
EG Risk 48/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity100% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation7.6% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
7.6%
EPSS %ILE
94th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
10.0 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v2.0 · CVSS v2.0AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
EG Likelihood
7.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-11). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

February 2, 2013

Last Modified

April 29, 2026

References (27)

15 of 27 shown · show the other 12

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2013-1478(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(10)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(10)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 64× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 230 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 130 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 15:50 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-12 15:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84c5-rhrc-rq9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  4. 2026-11-11 16:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-11 16:31 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-11 16:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84c5-rhrc-rq9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  7. 2026-11-11 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  8. 2026-11-10 17:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-10 17:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84c5-rhrc-rq9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  10. 2026-11-10 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  11. 2026-11-09 17:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-09 17:54 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-09 17:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84c5-rhrc-rq9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  14. 2026-11-09 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  15. 2026-11-08 18:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-08 18:36 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-11-08 18:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84c5-rhrc-rq9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  18. 2026-11-08 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  19. 2026-11-07 19:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-07 19:18 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-11-07 19:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84c5-rhrc-rq9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  22. 2026-11-07 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  23. 2026-11-06 19:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-06 19:55 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-11-06 19:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84c5-rhrc-rq9v · GitHub severity HIGH
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  2. 2026-11-05 20:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-05 20:37 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-05 20:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84c5-rhrc-rq9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  5. 2026-11-05 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  6. 2026-11-04 21:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-04 21:19 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-04 21:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84c5-rhrc-rq9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  9. 2026-11-04 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  10. 2026-11-03 22:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-03 22:00 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-11-03 22:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84c5-rhrc-rq9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  13. 2026-11-03 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  14. 2026-11-02 22:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-02 22:42 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-02 22:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84c5-rhrc-rq9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  17. 2026-11-01 23:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-01 23:16 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-01 23:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84c5-rhrc-rq9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  20. 2026-10-31 23:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-31 23:57 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-31 23:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84c5-rhrc-rq9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  23. 2026-10-31 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  24. 2026-10-31 00:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-31 00:38 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-31 00:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84c5-rhrc-rq9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  27. 2026-10-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  28. 2026-10-30 01:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-30 01:20 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-30 01:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84c5-rhrc-rq9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  31. 2026-10-29 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  32. 2026-10-29 02:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-29 02:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84c5-rhrc-rq9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  34. 2026-10-28 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  35. 2026-10-28 02:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-28 02:43 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-28 02:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84c5-rhrc-rq9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  38. 2026-10-27 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  39. 2026-10-27 03:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-27 03:18 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-27 03:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84c5-rhrc-rq9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  42. 2026-10-26 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  43. 2026-10-25 23:56 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-25 23:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84c5-rhrc-rq9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  45. 2026-10-25 20:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-25 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  47. 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  48. 2026-10-23 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  49. 2026-10-22 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  50. 2026-10-21 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  51. 2026-10-20 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  52. 2026-10-19 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  53. 2026-10-18 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  54. 2026-10-18 11:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-17 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  56. 2026-10-16 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  57. 2026-10-15 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  58. 2026-10-14 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  59. 2026-10-13 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  60. 2026-10-12 21:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-12 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  62. 2026-10-12 01:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-11 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  64. 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  65. 2026-10-09 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  66. 2026-10-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  67. 2026-10-07 23:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  68. 2026-10-06 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  69. 2026-10-05 17:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  70. 2026-10-04 23:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  71. 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  72. 2026-09-29 20:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-09-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  74. 2026-09-26 15:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile
  75. 2026-09-24 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 7.6% · 94th percentile

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2013-1478?
CVE-2013-1478 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on February 2, 2013. Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 through Update 11, 6 through Update 38, 5.0 through Update 38, and 1.4.2_40 and earlier, and OpenJDK 6 and 7, allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown…
When was CVE-2013-1478 made public?
CVE-2013-1478 was made public on February 1, 2013: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Oracle, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on February 2, 2013. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of April 29, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2013-1478 actively exploited?
CVE-2013-1478 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 7.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (94th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2013-1478?
A fix for CVE-2013-1478 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2013-1478 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2013-1478

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2013-1478?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.