CVE-2010-3563

HIGHCVSS v2 · 10.010.0
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS v2 base score.

This CVE was only ever scored under CVSS v2.0. NVD CVSS v2.0 base 10.0 — NVD rates that HIGH (NVD's v2 bands: LOW 0.0–3.9 / MEDIUM 4.0–6.9 / HIGH 7.0–10.0; no CRITICAL band). Vector AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C. CVSS v2 is an older, coarser metric than v3.1/v4.0 (no Scope, no User Interaction, no Attack Requirements), so it is not directly comparable to a v3 or v4 score. NVD has never re-scored this record under v3. EPSS predicts 84% exploitation probability in the next 30 days; it does not lift the v2 base. EPSS sets EG Risk's exploitation input. Confidence: LOW.

Triggered by: NVD CVSS v2.0 (legacy fallback)
Sources: NVD CVSS v2.0
Weaponized

Also known asEUVD-2010-3559 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

10.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 84%
  • Public exploit code is available (Metasploit, Exploit-DB, marked verified by Exploit-DB)
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 84%CVSS v2: 10.0Exploit: Metasploit · Exploit-DB (verified)Exposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Unspecified vulnerability in the Deployment component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 21 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the October 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable researcher that this is related to "how Web Start retrieves security policies," BasicServiceImpl, and forged policies that bypass sandbox restrictions.

CVSS v2.0 (legacy)
10.0HIGHNVD never assigned a CVSS v3 rating to this CVE
EG Score
10.0HIGHlow confidence
EG Risk
79
EG Risk 79/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity100% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation84% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
84%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
10.0 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v2.0 · CVSS v2.0AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
EG Likelihood
84% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-14). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 19, 2010

Last Modified

April 29, 2026

References (14)

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatjava-1.6.0-ibm-1:1.6.0.9.1-1jpp.1.el52011-06-16redhat
redhatjava-1.6.0-ibm-1:1.6.0.9.0-1jpp.3.el52010-12-15redhat
redhatjava-1.6.0-sun-1:1.6.0.22-1jpp.1.el52010-10-14redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 78× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 186 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 86 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-14 16:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-14 16:50 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-14 16:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  4. 2026-11-13 18:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-13 18:57 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-13 18:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  7. 2026-11-12 20:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-12 20:00 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-11-12 20:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  10. 2026-11-12 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  11. 2026-11-11 22:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-11 22:07 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-11 22:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  14. 2026-11-11 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  15. 2026-11-11 00:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-11 00:11 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-11-11 00:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  18. 2026-11-10 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  19. 2026-11-10 02:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-10 02:12 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-11-10 02:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  22. 2026-11-09 04:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-09 04:19 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-11-09 04:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  25. 2026-11-08 06:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-08 06:18 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-11-08 06:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  3. 2026-11-07 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  4. 2026-11-07 08:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-07 08:25 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-07 08:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  7. 2026-11-06 10:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-06 10:32 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-11-06 10:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  10. 2026-11-05 12:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-05 12:40 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-11-05 12:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  13. 2026-11-04 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  14. 2026-11-04 14:47 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-04 14:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  16. 2026-11-03 16:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-03 16:54 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-03 16:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  19. 2026-11-02 19:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-02 19:01 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-11-02 19:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  22. 2026-11-01 21:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-01 21:08 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-11-01 21:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  25. 2026-10-31 23:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-31 23:15 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-31 23:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  28. 2026-10-31 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  29. 2026-10-31 01:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-31 01:23 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-31 01:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  32. 2026-10-30 03:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-30 03:30 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-30 03:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  35. 2026-10-29 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  36. 2026-10-29 05:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-29 05:37 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-29 05:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  39. 2026-10-28 07:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-28 07:44 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-28 07:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  42. 2026-10-27 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  43. 2026-10-27 09:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-27 09:52 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-27 09:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  46. 2026-10-26 12:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-26 12:00 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-26 12:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  49. 2026-10-25 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  50. 2026-10-25 13:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-25 13:54 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-25 13:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  53. 2026-10-24 16:01 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-24 16:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  55. 2026-10-23 17:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-23 17:48 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-23 17:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  58. 2026-10-22 19:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-22 19:55 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-22 19:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  61. 2026-10-22 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  62. 2026-10-21 22:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-21 22:01 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-21 22:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  65. 2026-10-21 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  66. 2026-10-20 23:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-10-20 23:59 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-20 23:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  69. 2026-10-20 01:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-20 01:48 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-20 01:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH
  72. 2026-10-19 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  73. 2026-10-19 00:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-10-19 00:49 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-10-19 00:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fj9r-jhxx-vm9v · GitHub severity HIGH

Publicly available exploits

(2 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 1 Exploit-DB entry). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Exploit-DBEDB-16495✓ verified
    Published Jan 22, 2011

    Sun Java Web Start BasicServiceImpl - Remote Code Execution (Metasploit)

    Open source ↗
  • Metasploitexploit/windows/browser/java_basicservice_impl✓ verified
    Published Nov 19, 2010

    Sun Java Web Start BasicServiceImpl Code Execution

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2010-3563?
CVE-2010-3563 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 19, 2010. Unspecified vulnerability in the Deployment component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 21 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the October 2010 CPU. Oracle has not…
When was CVE-2010-3563 made public?
CVE-2010-3563 was made public on October 12, 2010: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Oracle, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on October 19, 2010. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of April 29, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2010-3563 actively exploited?
CVE-2010-3563 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. EchelonGraph's EG-KEV model places it in Tier 2 (Weaponized), which is not evidence of exploitation: a Metasploit module exists for it, and Exploit-DB marks a public exploit for it as verified. EchelonGraph does not test whether exploit code works. FIRST EPSS estimates a 84% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2010-3563?
A fix for CVE-2010-3563 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2010-3563 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2010-3563

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2010-3563?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.