CVE-2002-0391

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 58% (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2002-0388 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 58%
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 58%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Integer overflow in xdr_array function in RPC servers for operating systems that use libc, glibc, or other code based on SunRPC including dietlibc, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by passing a large number of arguments to xdr_array through RPC services such as rpc.cmsd and dmispd.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
82
EG Risk 82/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation58% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
58%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
58% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 12, 2002

Last Modified

June 16, 2026

References (38)

15 of 38 shown · show the other 23

Patch Availability(6)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatpatch2003-06-26redhat
redhatpatch2003-04-29redhat
redhatpatch2002-09-05redhat
redhatpatch2002-08-15redhat
redhatpatch2002-08-13redhat
redhatpatch2002-08-06redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(23 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(5)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
acm—
  • every version up to 5.0-10: fixed in 5.0-10
—
dietlibc—
  • every version up to 0.20-0cvs20020808: fixed in 0.20-0cvs20020808
—
glibc—
  • every version up to 2.2.5-13: fixed in 2.2.5-13
—
krb5—
  • every version up to 1.2.5-2: fixed in 1.2.5-2
—
openafs—
  • every version up to 1.2.6-1: fixed in 1.2.6-1
—
Debian:12(5)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
acm—
  • every version up to 5.0-10: fixed in 5.0-10
—
dietlibc—
  • every version up to 0.20-0cvs20020808: fixed in 0.20-0cvs20020808
—
glibc—
  • every version up to 2.2.5-13: fixed in 2.2.5-13
—
krb5—
  • every version up to 1.2.5-2: fixed in 1.2.5-2
—
openafs—
  • every version up to 1.2.6-1: fixed in 1.2.6-1
—
Debian:13(5)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
acm—
  • every version up to 5.0-10: fixed in 5.0-10
—
dietlibc—
  • every version up to 0.20-0cvs20020808: fixed in 0.20-0cvs20020808
—
glibc—
  • every version up to 2.2.5-13: fixed in 2.2.5-13
—
krb5—
  • every version up to 1.2.5-2: fixed in 1.2.5-2
—
openafs—
  • every version up to 1.2.6-1: fixed in 1.2.6-1
—
Debian:3.0(5)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
acm—
  • every version up to 5.0-3.woody.1: fixed in 5.0-3.woody.1
—
dietlibc—
  • every version up to 0.12-2.4: fixed in 0.12-2.4
—
glibc—
  • every version up to 2.2.5-11.1: fixed in 2.2.5-11.1
—
krb5—
  • every version up to 1.2.4-5woody1: fixed in 1.2.4-5woody1
—
openafs—
  • every version up to 1.2.3final2-6: fixed in 1.2.3final2-6
—
Debian:14(3)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
dietlibc—
  • every version up to 0.20-0cvs20020808: fixed in 0.20-0cvs20020808
—
glibc—
  • every version up to 2.2.5-13: fixed in 2.2.5-13
—
krb5—
  • every version up to 1.2.5-2: fixed in 1.2.5-2
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(6)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 82× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 211 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 111 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 03:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 03:36 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-13 03:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  4. 2026-11-12 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
  5. 2026-11-12 03:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-12 03:49 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-12 03:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  8. 2026-11-11 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
  9. 2026-11-11 04:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-11 04:03 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-11 04:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  12. 2026-11-10 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
  13. 2026-11-10 04:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-10 04:16 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-10 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  16. 2026-11-09 04:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-09 04:26 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-09 04:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  19. 2026-11-08 04:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-08 04:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  21. 2026-11-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
  22. 2026-11-07 04:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-07 04:53 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-11-07 04:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  25. 2026-11-06 05:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-06 05:07 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-11-06 05:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  3. 2026-11-05 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
  4. 2026-11-05 05:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-05 05:21 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-05 05:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  7. 2026-11-04 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
  8. 2026-11-04 05:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-04 05:35 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-04 05:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  11. 2026-11-03 05:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-03 05:48 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-03 05:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  14. 2026-11-02 06:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-02 06:02 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-02 06:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  17. 2026-11-01 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
  18. 2026-11-01 06:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-01 06:16 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-01 06:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  21. 2026-11-01 04:25 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-10-31 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
  23. 2026-10-31 06:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-31 06:30 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-31 06:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  26. 2026-10-30 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
  27. 2026-10-30 06:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-30 06:44 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-30 06:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  30. 2026-10-29 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
  31. 2026-10-29 06:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-29 06:58 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-29 06:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  34. 2026-10-28 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
  35. 2026-10-28 07:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-28 07:12 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-28 07:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  38. 2026-10-27 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
  39. 2026-10-27 07:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-27 07:26 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-27 07:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  42. 2026-10-26 04:51 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-26 04:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  44. 2026-10-25 20:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-25 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
  46. 2026-10-25 05:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-25 05:05 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-25 05:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  49. 2026-10-24 05:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-24 05:19 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-24 05:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  52. 2026-10-23 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
  53. 2026-10-23 05:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-23 05:32 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-23 05:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  56. 2026-10-22 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
  57. 2026-10-22 05:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-22 05:44 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-22 05:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  60. 2026-10-21 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
  61. 2026-10-21 05:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-10-21 05:56 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-21 05:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  64. 2026-10-20 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
  65. 2026-10-20 06:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-20 06:09 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-20 06:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  68. 2026-10-19 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile
  69. 2026-10-19 06:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-19 06:21 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-19 06:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  72. 2026-10-18 06:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-18 06:33 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-18 06:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2qf2-q2gj-r6v2 · GitHub severity HIGH
  75. 2026-10-17 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 58% · 99th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2002-0391?
CVE-2002-0391 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 12, 2002. Integer overflow in xdr_array function in RPC servers for operating systems that use libc, glibc, or other code based on SunRPC including dietlibc, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by passing a large number of arguments to xdr_array through RPC services such as rpc.cmsd and dmispd.
When was CVE-2002-0391 made public?
CVE-2002-0391 was made public on July 29, 2002: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, MITRE Corporation, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on August 12, 2002. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of June 16, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2002-0391 actively exploited?
CVE-2002-0391 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 58% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2002-0391?
CVE-2002-0391 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2002-0391?
A fix for CVE-2002-0391 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2002-0391

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2002-0391?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.